How Does The Texas State Election Affect The Ideological Makeup Of The Court Texas

Texas Supreme Court
Court Information
Justices: 9
Founded: 1876
Location: Austin
Bacon
Chief: $187,800 Assembly: $184,800
Judicial Choice
Method: Partisan election
Term: 6 years
Agile justices
Brett Busby Debra Lehrmann Evan Immature Jane Bland Jeffrey Due south. Boyd Jimmy Blacklock John Devine (Texas) Nathan Hecht Rebeca Huddle

Founded in 1836, the Texas Supreme Courtroom is the state'southward court of last resort for civil matters and has nine judgeships. The current master of the court is Nathan Hecht.

As of June 2021, all eight judges on the court identified with the Republican Political party. The 9th seat became vacant on June xi, 2021, post-obit the resignation of Eva Guzman, who during her tenure as well identified with the Republican party.

The Texas Supreme Court meets in Austin, Texas.^[i]

In Texas, state supreme courtroom justices are elected in partisan elections. As of June 9, 2022, there are eight states that apply this selection method. To read more most the partisan election of judges, click hither.

Jurisdiction

The caseload of the Texas Supreme Court is adamant by whether the court decides to grant a review of a judgment. The courtroom has mandatory jurisdiction over writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

The Supreme Courtroom also has jurisdiction to answer questions of state constabulary certified from a federal appellate court; has original jurisdiction to result writs and to behave proceedings for the involuntary retirement or removal of judges; and reviews cases involving attorney subject field upon appeal from the Board of Disciplinary Appeals of the State Bar of Texas."^[2]

The following text from Commodity V, Section 3 of the Texas Constitution covers the organization and jurisdiction of the courtroom:

"	Jurisdiction of Supreme Courtroom; Writs; Clerk (a) The Supreme Courtroom shall do the judicial ability of the state except as otherwise provided in this Constitution. Its jurisdiction shall exist co-extensive with the limits of the State and its determinations shall be last except in criminal police force matters. Its appellate jurisdiction shall be final and shall extend to all cases except in criminal law matters and as otherwise provided in this Constitution or by law. The Supreme Court and the Justices thereof shall have ability to upshot writs of habeas corpus, every bit may exist prescribed by law, and under such regulations equally may exist prescribed by law, the said courts and the Justices thereof may issue the writs of mandamus, procedendo, certiorari and such other writs, as may exist necessary to enforce its jurisdiction. The Legislature may confer original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to event writs of quo warranto and mandamus in such cases every bit may exist specified, except as against the Governor of the State. (b) The Supreme Courtroom shall likewise have power, upon affidavit or otherwise as by the courtroom may be adamant, to ascertain such matters of fact as may exist necessary to the proper do of its jurisdiction.[3] [4]	"
—Texas Constitution, Commodity 5, Section iii

Justices

Judge	Appointed By
Debra Lehrmann	Rick Perry (R)
Jane Bland	Greg Abbott (R)
Rebeca Huddle	Greg Abbott (R)
Evan Young	Greg Abbott (R)
John Devine	Elected
Jimmy Blacklock	Greg Abbott (R)
Nathan Hecht	Rick Perry (R)
Brett Busby	Greg Abbott (R)
Jeffrey South. Boyd	Rick Perry (R)

Chief justice

Nathan Hecht (R) was appointed chief justice of the Supreme Courtroom of Texas past Governor Rick Perry (R) on September 10, 2013. Hecht was re-elected in 2014 and 2020.^{[5] [6]}

Vacancies

As of November 12, 2021, there were no vacancies on the Texas Supreme Court, out of the court's ix judicial positions.

Judicial selection

See likewise: Judicial selection in Texas

The nine justices of the supreme court are selected in statewide partisan elections. The elected justices serve 6-year terms, after which they must run for re-ballot if they wish to remain on the courtroom.^[7]

Qualifications

To serve on the Supreme Court, a judge must be:

• a U.S. citizen;
• a resident of Texas;
• licensed to practice law in the state;
• between the ages of 35 and 75;*^[8] and
• a practicing lawyer and/or judge for at to the lowest degree 10 years.^[vii]

*While no judge older than 74 may run for function, sitting judges who turn 75 are permitted to remain on the court until their terms expire.^[7]

Chief justice

The chief justice of the Supreme Court is selected by voters at large. He or she serves in that capacity for a full six-year term.^[7]

Vacancies

See also: How vacancies are filled in state supreme courts

In the event of a midterm vacancy, the governor appoints a replacement who must be confirmed by the Texas Senate. The appointee serves until the next general election, in which he or she may compete to serve for the residuum of the unexpired term.^[7]

The map beneath highlights how vacancies are filled in state supreme courts across the country.

Elections and appointments

In Texas, judges are appointed to fill up midterm vacancies. Newly appointed judges must stand in the post-obit general election to serve the residual of their predecessor's term. Later on the term expires, justices must win another partisan general election to proceeds their offset total, 6-year term.

2022

Come across too: Texas Supreme Court elections, 2022

Texas is one of two states with two courts of last resort. The Texas Supreme Court is the state's court of concluding resort for civil matters. The terms of three supreme courtroom justices volition expire on December 31, 2022. The Texas Courtroom of Criminal Appeals is the state'southward courtroom of last resort for criminal matters. The terms of three court of criminal appeals justices will elapse on December 31, 2022. All six seats are up for partisan election on November 8, 2022. A master was scheduled for March 1, 2022.

Judges with expiring terms

This is a list of the justices who must correspond partisan election in 2022 in order to remain on the bench. Justices may choose not to stand for ballot. The listing is discipline to change if justices retire or are appointed.

Texas Supreme Court
■ Rebeca Huddle
■ Debra Lehrmann
■ Evan Young

Texas Courtroom of Criminal Appeals
■ Scott Walker
■ Jesse McClure
■ Mary Lou Keel

2020

See also: Texas Supreme Court elections, 2020

Texas is one of ii states with ii courts of terminal resort. The terms of four Texas Supreme Court justices expired on December 31, 2020. The terms of three Texas Court of Criminal Appeals justices expired on Dec 31, 2020. All seven seats were up for partisan election on November 3, 2020. A main was scheduled for March 3, 2020, and a primary runoff was scheduled for July xiv, 2020.

Judges with expiring terms

This is a list of the justices who had to stand for partisan ballot in 2020 in order to remain on the bench. Justices could cull not to stand for election.

Texas Supreme Court
■ Jeffrey S. Boyd
■ Brett Busby
■ Nathan Hecht
■ Jane Bland

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
■ David Newell
■ Bert Richardson
■ Kevin Patrick Yeary

2018

See also: Texas Supreme Courtroom elections, 2018

Place 2

General election

Democratic principal election

Republican primary ballot

Place 4

General election

Democratic master ballot

Republican main election

Place half dozen

General ballot

Democratic primary election

Republican primary ballot

2016

Master commodity: Texas Supreme Court elections, 2016

Three seats on the Texas Supreme Court were on the general election ballot on November 8, 2016, with a primary held on March 1.

These seats were held past Justice Debra Lehrmann (R), Justice Paul Green (R), and Justice Eva Guzman (R) heading into the election. Each justice elected to the courtroom serves a six-year term. The court had a ix-0 Republican bulk prior to the 2016 election and hold information technology following the election.

General election candidates

Election results

November 8 general ballot

Texas Supreme Court, Place 3, 2016
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Republican	Debra Lehrmann Incumbent	54.84%	4,807,986
	Autonomous	Mike Westergren	38.53%	3,378,163
	Libertarian	Kathie Drinking glass	3.97%	348,376
	Green	Rodolfo Rivera Munoz	ii.65%	232,646
Full Votes(100% reporting)				eight,767,171
Source: Texas Secretary of State Official Results

Texas Supreme Courtroom, Place v, 2016
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Republican	Paul Greenish Incumbent	54.xxx%	4,758,334
	Autonomous	Dori Garza	41.18%	iii,608,634
	Libertarian	Tom Oxford	3.29%	288,504
	Dark-green	Charles E. Waterbury	1.23%	107,731
Total Votes(100% reporting)				8,763,203
Source: Texas Secretary of State Official Results

Texas Supreme Court, Identify 9, 2016
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Republican	Eva Guzman Incumbent	55.eighty%	4,884,441
	Democratic	Savannah Robinson	39.36%	3,445,959
	Libertarian	Don Fulton	3.48%	304,587
	Green	Jim Chisholm	1.36%	119,022
Total Votes(100% reporting)				8,754,009
Source: Texas Secretary of State Official Results

March 1 primary election

Place three

Texas Supreme Court, Identify three, Democratic Principal, 2016
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Democratic	Mike Westergren  (unopposed)	100.00%	986,878
Total Votes(100% Reporting)				986,878
Source: Texas Secretarial assistant of State Official Results

Texas Supreme Court, Place 3, Republican Primary, 2016
Political party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Republican	Debra Lehrmann Incumbent	52.22%	one,131,998
	Republican	Michael Massengale	47.78%	1,035,840
Total Votes(100% Reporting)				two,167,838
Source: Texas Secretary of State Official Results

Place 5

Texas Supreme Courtroom, Place 5, Democratic Master, 2016
Political party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Autonomous	Dori Garza  (unopposed)	100.00%	1,022,469
Total Votes(100% Reporting)				1,022,469
Source: Texas Secretary of State Official Results

Texas Supreme Court, Identify 5, Republican Primary, 2016
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Republican	Paul Green Incumbent	52.06%	1,078,689
	Republican	Rick Green	47.94%	993,441
Total Votes(100% Reporting)				ii,072,130
Source: Texas Secretary of State Official Results

Place 9

Texas Supreme Court, Place 9, Democratic Primary, 2016
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Democratic	Savannah Robinson  (unopposed)	100.00%	991,329
Total Votes(100% Reporting)				991,329
Source: Texas Secretary of State Official Results

Texas Supreme Court, Place 9, Republican Principal, 2016
Party		Candidate	Vote %	Votes
	Republican	Eva Guzman Incumbent	59.17%	1,268,415
	Republican	Joe Pool, Jr.	40.83%	875,224
Total Votes(100% Reporting)				2,143,639
Source: Texas Secretary of Land Official Results

2014

See also: Texas Supreme Courtroom elections, 2014

Chief Justice

Candidate	Incumbency	Party	Primary Vote	Ballot Vote
HechtNathan Hecht A	Yes	Republican	60.5% A	59.7% A
MoodyWilliam Moody	No	Democratic	100% A	37.2% D
OxfordTom Oxford	No	Libertarian		iii.1% D
TaltonRobert Talton	No	Republican	39.five%

Place half dozen

Candidate	Incumbency	Party	Primary Vote	Ballot Vote
MeyersLawrence Meyers	No	Autonomous	100% A	36.5% D
AshMarker Ash	No	Libertarian		3.2% D
Joe Pool, Jr.	No		28.1%
BrownJeff Brown (Texas) A	Aye	Republican	71.9% A	60.3% A

Place vii

Candidate	Incumbency	Party	Chief Vote	Ballot Vote
BoydJeffrey South. Boyd A	Yep	Republican	100% A	58.nine% A
FultonDon Fulton	No	Libertarian		2.viii% D
WaterburyCharles East. Waterbury	No	Green		0.seven% D
BenavidesGina Benavides	No	Democratic	100% A	37.6% D

Identify eight

Candidate	Incumbency	Political party	Principal Vote	Election Vote
McCallySharon McCally	No		36.0%
ChisholmJim Chisholm	No	Green		9.2% D
KoelschRS Roberto Koelsch	No	Libertarian		12.0% D
JohnsonPhil Johnson A	Yep	Republican	64.0% A	78.8% A

Caseloads

The table below details the number of cases filed with the court and the number of dispositions (decisions) the courtroom reached in each year.^[ten]

Texas Supreme Court caseload data
Year	Filings	Dispositions
2020	1,328	1,379
2019	1,416	ane,459
2018	i,420	ane,451
2017	1,319	one,285
2016	i,199	1,190
2015	1,273	ane,225
2014	1,211	1,217
2013	i,226	1,264
2012	i,224	1,209
2011	1,235	1,247
2010	1,337	1,339
2009	1,245	i,196
2008	i,229	1,321
2007	1,244	i,337

Analysis

Ballotpedia Courts: Determiners and Dissenters (2021)

See too: Ballotpedia Courts: Determiners and Dissenters

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: Determiners and Dissenters, a written report on how state supreme court justices decided the cases that came earlier them. Our goal was to determine which justices ruled together most often, which ofttimes dissented, and which courts featured the most unanimous or contentious decisions.

The study tracked the position taken by each country supreme court justice in every example they decided in 2020, then tallied the number of times the justices on the court ruled together. Nosotros identified the following types of justices:

• Nosotros considered two justices opinion partners if they oft concurred or dissented together throughout the year.
• We considered justices a dissenting minority if they oft opposed decisions together as a -1 minority.
• Nosotros considered a grouping of justices a determining majority if they oft determined cases by a +1 majority throughout the yr.
• We considered a justice a lone dissenter if he or she frequently dissented lonely in cases throughout the yr.

Summary of cases decided in 2020

• Number of justices: 9
• Number of cases: ninety
• Percentage of cases with a unanimous ruling: 82.2% (74)
• Justice about oftentimes writing the majority stance: Justices Banal and Busby (10 each)
• Per curiam decisions: 28
• Concurring opinions: xi
• Justice with most concurring opinions: Justices Guzman and Blacklock (3 each)
• Dissenting opinions: 17
• Justice with virtually dissenting opinions: Justice Boyd (vi)

For the study's full set up of findings in Texas, click here.

Ballotpedia Courts: Land Partisanship (2020)

See too: Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship

Concluding updated: June xv, 2020

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: Land Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all country supreme courtroom justices in the land as of June 15, 2020.

The report presented Confidence Scores that represented our confidence in each justice's degree of partisan affiliation, based on a variety of factors. This was non a measure of where a justice fell on the political or ideological spectrum, simply rather a measure of how much conviction we had that a justice was or had been affiliated with a political party. To go far at confidence scores we analyzed each justice's past partisan activity by collecting data on campaign finance, by political positions, party registration history, also as other factors. The 5 categories of Conviction Scores were:

• Strong Democrat
• Mild Democrat
• Indeterminate^[xi]
• Mild Republican
• Strong Republican

We used the Confidence Scores of each justice to develop a Court Rest Score, which attempted to show the rest amid justices with Democratic, Republican, and Indeterminate Confidence Scores on a court. Courts with higher positive Court Balance Scores included justices with higher Republican Confidence Scores, while courts with lower negative Court Residuum Scores included justices with college Democratic Confidence Scores. Courts closest to zero either had justices with alien partisanship or justices with Indeterminate Confidence Scores.^[12]

Texas had a Court Balance Score of 10.4, indicating Republican control of the court. In total, the written report found that there were 15 states with Democrat-controlled courts, 27 states with Republican-controlled courts, and 8 states with Split courts. The map beneath shows the court balance score of each state.

Bonica and Woodruff campaign finance scores (2012)

See too: Bonica and Woodruff entrada finance scores of state supreme court justices, 2012

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford Academy attempted to determine the partisan outlook of state supreme court justices in their newspaper, "State Supreme Courtroom Credo and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns." A score higher up 0 indicated a more bourgeois-leaning ideology while scores beneath 0 were more than liberal. The state Supreme Court of Texas was given a campaign finance score (CFscore), which was calculated for judges in Oct 2012. At that fourth dimension, Texas received a score of 0.91. Based on the justices selected, Texas was the third nigh conservative court. The study was based on information from campaign contributions by judges themselves, the partisan leaning of contributors to the judges, or—in the absence of elections—the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice just rather an academic guess of diverse factors.^[13]

Noteworthy cases

The following are noteworthy cases heard before the Texas Supreme Court. For a full list of opinions published past the court, click here. Know of a case we should cover here? Let us know by emailing us.

• Texas Supreme Court rules in Boeing v. Paxton (2015) Guess(s):John Devine (Boeing 5. Paxton, No. 12-1007)	Click for summary→
In a vii-1 opinion in June 2015, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that Texas Chaser General Ken Paxton must cake the release of data from a lease between Boeing and the Port Authority of San Antonio. The reasoning was that the information, according to Boeing, could benefit the visitor'due south competitors. Previously, the state had blocked the release of information only when proprietary information and merchandise secrets were at pale.[xiv] The example concerned the lease between Boeing, an aerospace manufacturer, and the Port Authority for a manufacturing facility at Kelly Field Annex, formerly an air forcefulness base. In 2005, a quondam Boeing employee requested the release of the full lease; Paxton's role argued that Boeing's efforts to redact parts of the lease were not protected nether the state'southward Public Information Deed.[14] Boeing argued that data requested could allow a competitor to calculate the San Antonio performance's overhead costs, potentially putting Boeing at a disadvantage for future authorities projects.[14] Two lower courts sided with the Chaser General's office earlier the Supreme Courtroom reversed their decisions and favored Boeing.[14] Judge John Devine wrote for the majority that the test for whether information can be blocked "is whether knowing another bidder's overhead costs would be an advantage, not whether it would be a decisive advantage."[14] He too cited a recent Attorney General ruling allowing Governor Greg Abbott confidentiality in his meetings with out-of-state businesses he sought to attract to Texas, on the grounds that the governor's function is a "competitor" for the business' jobs.[14] In the simply dissent, Justice Jeffrey S. Boyd argued that Boeing'south defense was "besides hypothetical and speculative" to qualify for country protection.[14] He wrote that Boeing failed to identify a specific federal contract for which information technology is competing or any specific competitor; he also wrote that Boeing failed to identify a specific advantage a competitor might garner through the release of the information.[14] The instance drew attention for its attain. Within three months of the ruling, the Attorney Full general's office cited Boeing v. Paxton at to the lowest degree three times when siding with private companies nether regime contract.[14]

• Texas Supreme Court rules on Open Beaches Act (2013) (Severance 5. Patterson, No. 09-0387)	Click for summary→
Texans litigated embankment buying as the Texas Supreme Court heard Severance v. Patterson in January 2013 regarding the Open Beaches Human activity. The court overturned an appellate ruling that gave the city of Surfside the right to refuse repairs and extend utilities to beachfront homes that were determined to be in the public right-of-way due to erosion. 13 beachfront homeowners argued that the Texas Full general Land Office's attempts to strength them to remove their houses from the public right-of-way amounted to property theft. The State Office, in a similar situation on Galveston Island, argued that state money cannot legally exist spent on private property and that the erosion moving houses to the public beach made that beachfront private belongings. In 2012, the courtroom determined that the 1959 Open up Beaches Deed, which was voted into the state Constitution in 2009 to allow public access to beaches, did not utilise in the cases of an avulsive event. Such events could include a tempest, which, past no fault of the homeowners, could cause erosion and move their firm to the public embankment.[15]

Ethics

The Texas Code of Judicial Conduct sets along ethical guidelines and principles for the conduct of judges and judicial candidates in Texas. It consists of eight overarching canons:

• Canon 1: Upholding the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary
• Canon 2: Avoiding Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All of the Guess'southward Activities
• Canon 3: Performing the Duties of Judicial Role Impartially and Diligently
• Catechism 4: Conducting the Judge's Extra-Judicial Activities to Minimize the Take chances of Disharmonize with Judicial Obligations
• Canon 5: Refraining from Inappropriate Political Activity
• Catechism 6: Compliance with the Code of Judicial Comport
• Canon 7: Constructive Appointment of Compliance
• Canon 8: Construction and Terminology of the Code^[xvi]

The total text of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct can be found hither.

History of the court

The Republic of Texas' Constitution created a Supreme Court. The courtroom consisted of a chief justice and associate justices, who were from the viii commune courts of the state. These judges served with the chief justice from January 13, 1840, to December 29, 1845. At the end of 1845, Texas was admitted into the Spousal relationship.^[17]

Former justices

All former justices of the Texas Supreme Courtroom: [18]	click for list →
Proper name:	Dates served:
Eva Guzman	2009-2021
Wallace B. Jefferson	2001-2013
David Medina	2004-2012
Dale Wainwright	2003-2012
Harriet O'Neill	2005-2010
Scott A. Brister	2003-2009
Priscilla R. Owen	1995-2005
Michael H. Schneider	2002-2004
Steven Westward. Smith	2002-2004
Thomas R. Phillips	1988-2004
Craig T. Enoch	1993-2003
Xavier Rodriguez	2001-2002
James A. Bakery	1995-2002
Deborah Hankinson	1997-2002
Greg Abbott	1996-2001
Alberto R. Gonzales	1999-2000
Rose Spector	1993-1998
Raul A. Gonzalez	1984-1998
John Cornyn	1991-1997
Jack Hightower	1988-1996
Bob Gammage	1991-1995
Lloyd Doggett	1989-1994
Eugene A. Melt	1988-1992
Oscar H. Mauzy	1987-1992
C. L. Ray Jr.	1980-1990
Franklin Due south. Spears	1979-1990
Barbara Culver	1988
John L. Loma Jr.	1985-1988
William W. Kilgarlin	1983-1988
Ted Robertson	1982-1988
James P. Wallace	1981-1988
Sears McGee	1969-1986
Jack Pope	1965-1985
Charles West. Barrow	1977-1984
Ruby Kless Sondock	1982-1983
James Chiliad. Denton	1971-1982
Joe R. Greenhill	1957-1982
Will Garwood	1979-1980
Zollie Steakley	1961-1980
Sam Johnson	1973-1979
T. C. Chadick	1977-1978
Price Daniel	1971-1978
Don Yarbrough	1977
Thomas M. Reavley	1968-1977
Ross E. Doughty	1975-1976
Ruel C. Walker	1954-1975
Hawthorne Phillips	1972
Robert W. Calvert	1950-1972
Robert Westward. Hamilton	1959-1970
Clyde E. Smith	1950-1970
James R. Norvell	1957-1968
Meade F. Griffin	1949-1968
Frank P. Culver Jr.	1953-1965
J. E. Hickman	1945-1961
Due west. St. John Garwood	1948-1958
Abner V. McCall	1956
Will Wilson	1951-1956
Graham B. Smedley	1945-1954
John H. Sharp	1945-1952
R. H. Harvey	1949-1950
James P. Hart	1947-1950
Westward. M. Taylor	1945-1950
A. J. Folley	1945-1949
Gordon Simpson	1945-1949
James P. Alexander	1941-1948
C. S. Slatton	1945-1947
Richard Critz	1935-1945
John H. Precipitous	1934-1945
Due west. F. Moore	1940-1941
C. M. Cureton	1921-1940
William Pierson	1921-1935
Thomas B. Greenwood	1918-1934
William E. Hawkins	1913-1921
Nelson Phillips	1912-1921
J. E. Yantis	1915-1918
Thomas J. Brown	1893-1915
J. B. Bibrell	1911-1913
W. F. Ramsey	1911-1912
Reuben R. Gaines	1986-1911
F. A. Williams	1899-1911
Leroy G. Denman	1894-1899
John West. Stayton	1881-1894
J. L. Henry	1889-1893
A. Southward. Walker	1888-1889
Asa H. Willie	1882-1888
Sawnie Robertson	1885-1886
Charles S. West	1882-1885
Micajah H. Bonner	1878-1882
Robert Due south. Gould	1874-1882
George F. Moore	1874-1881
Oran M. Roberts	1874-1878
John Republic of ireland	1875-1876
Peter Westward. Gray	1874-1876
Reuben A. Reeves	1874-1876
Thomas J. Devine	1874-1875
William P. Ballinger	1874
J. D. McAdoo	1873-1874
Moses B. Walker	1870-1874
Wesley Ogden	1870-1874
Lemuel D. Evans	1870-1873
James Denison	1870
Moses B. Walker	1869-1870
Livingston Lindsay	1867-1870
Amos Morrill	1867-1870
Andrew J. Hamilton	1867-1869
Colbert Coldwell	1867-1869
Albert H. Latimer	1867-1869
Richard Coke	1866-1867
S. P. Donley	1866-1867
Asa H. Willie	1866-1867
George Westward. Smith	1866-1867
James H. Bell	1858-1864
Royall T. Wheeler	1846-1864
John Hemphil	1846-1858
Abner Southward. Lipscomb	1846-1856

Courts in Texas

Run into also: Courts in Texas

In addition to the federal courts in Texas, there are two courts of final resort, an intermediate appeals division, and several types of trial courts. Their infrastructure and human relationship are illustrated in the flow chart below.

The construction of Texas' land court organisation.

Partisan command of Texas land regime

A country government trifecta is a term that describes unmarried-party government, when 1 political party holds the governor's office and has majorities in both chambers of the legislature in a state regime. A state supreme court plays a role in the checks and balances arrangement of a state government.

Texas has a Republican trifecta. The Republican Party controls the role of governor and both chambers of the state legislature.

Meet also

Texas	Judicial Option	More Courts
Courts in Texas Texas Courts of Appeals Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Texas Supreme Court	Elections: 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 Gubernatorial appointments Judicial selection in Texas	Federal courts State courts Local courts

External links

• The Supreme Court of Texas
• Supreme Court of Texas Weblog
• Texas Supreme Court Historical Society

Footnotes

1. ↑ Texas Judicial Branch, "Supreme Court," accessed August 31, 2021
2. ↑ Texas Office of Court Administration, "FY 2010 Annual Report for the Texas Judiciary,"archived August 24, 2011
3. ↑ Texas Constitution and Statutes, "Texas Constitution," accessed March thirty, 2014
4. ↑ Annotation: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Whatever inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
5. ↑ Texas Tribune, "Perry: Hecht will replace Jefferson as chief justice," September 10, 2013
6. ↑ Texas Republican Political party, "Candidates for Justice, Supreme Court," archived August five, 2012
7. ↑ ^{seven.0 7.one 7.2 7.iii 7.4} Cite mistake: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named general
8. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named hist
9. ↑ Supreme Court of Texas Blog, "Other thoughts on Justice Brister'south departure," August 17, 2009
10. ↑ Texas Judicial Branch, "Statistics & Other Information," accessed September 23, 2019
11. ↑ An Indeterminate score indicates that there is either not enough data about the justice's partisan affiliations or that our enquiry institute conflicting partisan affiliations.
12. ↑ The Court Balance Score is calculated by finding the average partisan Conviction Score of all justices on a state supreme court. For case, if a land has justices on the state supreme court with Confidence Scores of 4, -2, 2, 14, -2, 3, and 4, the Court Balance is the average of those scores: three.3. Therefore, the Conviction Score on the court is Mild Republican. The use of positive and negative numbers in presenting both Confidence Scores and Court Balance Scores should non be understood to that either a Republican or Democratic score is positive or negative. The numerical values represent their distance from cypher, not whether i score is amend or worse than some other.
13. ↑ Stanford University, "Land Supreme Courtroom Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns," October 31, 2012
14. ↑ ^{fourteen.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 xiv.4 xiv.five 14.half dozen fourteen.7 xiv.8} Governing, "Court makes it easier for companies to proceed regime contracts secret in Texas," September 25, 2015
15. ↑ The Houston Chronicle, "Texas Court hits open beaches law," January 25, 2013
16. ↑ Texas Judicial Branch, "Texas Code of Judicial Deport," accessed August 31, 2021
17. ↑ Supreme Court of Texas, "Court History," accessed September 23, 2019
18. ↑ The Supreme Court of Texas, "Court History," accessed August 31, 2021

v•east Texas Supreme Court Judicial option in Texas • 2022 elections • 2020 elections • Noteworthy cases • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals • Courts in Texas
Current	Chief Justice: Nathan Hecht •  Jane Banal  •  Debra Lehrmann  •  Rebeca Huddle  •  John Devine (Texas)  •  Brett Busby  •  Jeffrey Due south. Boyd  •  Jimmy Blacklock  •  Evan Young
Former	Wallace Jefferson  •  Don Willett  •  Harriet O'Neill  •  David Medina  •  Paul Green (Texas)  •  Dale Wainwright  •  Phil Johnson  •  Scott Brister  •  Eugene Melt  •  Thomas Reavley  •  Priscilla Richman  •  Eva Guzman  •  Jeff Dark-brown (Texas)  •  Samuel Johnson  •  Lloyd Doggett  •  James P. Alexander  •  J. East. Hickman  •  Robert W. Calvert  •  Joe R. Greenhill  •  Jack Pope  •  John Fifty. Hill Jr. (Texas)  •  Thomas R. Phillips  •  John H. Abrupt  •  Frank P. Culver Jr.  •  Ted Robertson  •  Priscilla R. Owen  •  Gordon Simpson  •  R. H. Harvey  •  Zollie Steakley  •  James P. Wallace  •  Eugene A. Cook  •  Rose Spector  •  Graham B. Smedley  •  Ruel C. Walker  •  Ross Due east. Doughty  •  Don Yarbrough  •  Charles Due west. Barrow  •  Raul Gonzalez (Texas Supreme Courtroom justice)  •  Alberto R. Gonzales  •  Westward. M. Taylor  •  Volition Wilson  •  Abner Five. McCall  •  James R. Norvell  •  Thomas M. Reavley  •  T. C. Chadick  •  Barbara Culver  •  Jack Hightower  •  W. St. John Garwood  •  Robert W. Hamilton  •  James G. Denton  •  Ruby Kless Sondock  •  James P. Hart  •  C. S. Slatton  •  Clyde E. Smith  •  Price Daniel  •  Franklin S. Spears  •  Deborah Hankinson  •  Hawthorne Phillips  •  Sam Johnson (Texas Supreme Courtroom justice)  •  Will Garwood  •  C. L. Ray Jr.  •  Bob Gammage  •  James A. Baker  •  William W. Kilgarlin  •  Michael H. Schneider  •  A. J. Folley  •  Meade F. Griffin  •  Sears McGee  •  Oscar H. Mauzy  •  Craig T. Enoch  •  Oran M. Roberts  •  George F. Moore  •  Robert South. Gould  •  Asa H. Willie  •  John Westward. Stayton  •  Reuben R. Gaines  •  Thomas J. Chocolate-brown  •  Nelson Phillips  •  C. Thou. Cureton  •  Westward. F. Moore  •  A. S. Walker  •  J. Fifty. Henry  •  T. J. Chocolate-brown  •  W. F. Ramsey  •  J. E. Yantis  •  Thomas B. Greenwood  •  Micajah H. Bonner  •  Charles Southward. West  •  Sawnie Robertson  •  Reubin R. Gaines  •  Leroy G. Denman  •  Frank A. Williams  •  J. B. Bibrell  •  William E. Hawkins  •  William Pierson  •  Richard Critz  •  John Hemphil  •  Royall T. Wheeler  •  Abner South. Lipscomb  •  James H. Bell  •  Reuben A. Reeves  •  Livingston Lindsay  •  Albert H. Latimer  •  James Denison  •  Colbert Coldwell  •  C. B. Sabin  •  Andrew J. Hamilton  •  Moses B. Walker  •  Wesley Ogden  •  Lemuel D. Evans  •  Richard Coke  •  Due south. P. Donley  •  George West. Smith  •  J. D. McAdoo  •  Thomas J. Devine  •  John Ireland  •  William P. Ballinger  •  Peter W. Grey  •

v•due east Supreme Courts
Federal	Supreme Court of the The states
State	Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • D.C. • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New United mexican states • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oklahoma Criminal • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Texas Criminal • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • Due west Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

Source: https://ballotpedia.org/Texas_Supreme_Court

Posted by: cookshiled.blogspot.com

Share this post